Some Vegas weirdness-- the Pats opened up as 7 point road favorites against Houston, and with 99% of the money on the visitors, the line has only moved 1/2 a point. That's a clear no-play for me-- I don't see how Houston is competitive in this game, expect that it seems that Vegas thinks so. And I'm not betting against the house. I am not, however, taking the opposite side. I can't pull the trigger on Houston, no matter how much money Vegas is asking for on the Pats.
I'm taking the Steelers +3, for no reason other than this: in the Big Ben - Flacco era, 9 of the 12 games in the series have been decided by 3 or fewer points, including 8 of the last 10 match-ups. That's almost six seasons of generally close games. I'm happy to take the three points, with a chance to win or push. Steelers +3.
The other trend play would be on the Colts -4-- Andrew Luck is money ATS after a loss (now 8-0 ATS after a loss). The Titans won dramatically on Sunday on the road, but still trail in the division. Indy can put a killshot on Tennessee's divisional aspirations with a win at Lucas Oil Stadium, as the Titans still have games against Arizona and Denver. Indy's defense is horrific, and I think they may well be in a hole early, and have to put the game on Luck's back. I think this may well be the week that Andrew Luck's ATS after a loss trend crashes instead of cashes. I don't think Tennessee is the right play either. I'd play on Indy at -3 (and was really, really hoping that I'd get it in the wake of the Arizona debacle), but the -4, I just don't know. I do, however, like the over 44 1/2 in the Tennessee - Indianapolis game. Indy's defense is horrific, and I think they may well be in a hole early, and have to put the game on Luck's back. I think points will be scored; Indy is giving up over 32 points per game in their last five, and has been able to put up big numbers against divisional opponents this season. Tennessee - Indianapolis OVER 44 1/2.
Two picks off a tough board-- I'd be thrilled to go 1-0-1 on this one.
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Week 12 Recap
I had a pretty good week, going 3-1, but missing the perfect 4-0 by a point on the total play in the Dallas - New York game. Those two early botched red zone possessions for the Giants really hurt, but I'll take a 3-1 mark any week. The Jags - Texans game went exactly as I had expected, and the results on the side and total were never in doubt. Though I'm happy I made those plays (playing the trend of double digits division dogs especially), I am kicking myself a little for not playing the sharp play on the Cards and the Falcons. With the latter, I've been hosed a couple times on the Falcons that I missed the cover in the good spot. Sometimes teams can really get in your head, and I think Atlanta is one of those teams for me this season, so I missed a good play there.
The Minnesota - Green Bay game was wild-- I very well could have lost that game in OT, after holding a ticket for the +5 dog up 23 - 7 at the beginning of the 4th quarter. Green Bay nearly punched it in during the OT quarter, which would have blown the Minnesota play. Crazy game. People playing Minnesota on the moneyline must have just been sick-- just like the people enjoying their Denver -2 1/2 ticket at halftime on Sunday night. Classic Manning - Brady-- huge comeback, dramatic game, with Peyton finally responding to tie the game at 31-all, but the Pats pulling out the stunner at home. I'm so glad I wasn't on this game and could just enjoy it as pure sport.
Things change so fast in the NFL-- KC was riding high, but the naysayers that have been riding next to the bandwagon all season were correct. Now KC has lost 2 in a row, with a very real possible of making it 3, with this week's game against the Broncos. They caught a break with the Denver loss, though, which takes the sting out of the divisional loss to SD somewhat.
The Colts are clearly not the same team without Reggie Wayne. It seems that the receivers can't ever be competent all at the same time. If Fleener isn't dropping balls, Hilton is, and I don't think Heywood-Bey is the right fit for Indy. Richardson can't get going, which is at least as much about the O-line as him (which is also why Luck isn't being protected enough). There are some things to sort out in Indy, and for all the problems (solvable, mostly, going forward to next year), the biggest liability is the defense (shocking, I know, for a Colts squad). There's a lot of upside for this young team, but better defense is going to have to be part of it. Arizona just shelled them, not that it was terribly surprising. I stayed off this game (somewhat ironically) because the Cards are a good team, if underrated. The Colts usually play up to their opponents, and I thought they'd be more competitive.
Carolina won again, a gritty game with a Dolphin squad that rarely wins but almost always plays it close. This was a bad spot for Carolina-- an out of division game, before a huge divisional match-up, on the road, after a string of wings--- this is a hard, hard spot for any team. Kudos to them for taking care of business and putting a little fear into the Saints.
Don't look now, but the Steelers are tied for second in the division (with the defending Superbowl champs). Cincinnati has a tough road test this week, heading out to San Diego, and the Steelers battle the Ravens. The Bengals need a win to keep up their lead.
NFL 2013 Week 12: 3-1
NFL 2013 Season Total: 22-13
The Minnesota - Green Bay game was wild-- I very well could have lost that game in OT, after holding a ticket for the +5 dog up 23 - 7 at the beginning of the 4th quarter. Green Bay nearly punched it in during the OT quarter, which would have blown the Minnesota play. Crazy game. People playing Minnesota on the moneyline must have just been sick-- just like the people enjoying their Denver -2 1/2 ticket at halftime on Sunday night. Classic Manning - Brady-- huge comeback, dramatic game, with Peyton finally responding to tie the game at 31-all, but the Pats pulling out the stunner at home. I'm so glad I wasn't on this game and could just enjoy it as pure sport.
Things change so fast in the NFL-- KC was riding high, but the naysayers that have been riding next to the bandwagon all season were correct. Now KC has lost 2 in a row, with a very real possible of making it 3, with this week's game against the Broncos. They caught a break with the Denver loss, though, which takes the sting out of the divisional loss to SD somewhat.
The Colts are clearly not the same team without Reggie Wayne. It seems that the receivers can't ever be competent all at the same time. If Fleener isn't dropping balls, Hilton is, and I don't think Heywood-Bey is the right fit for Indy. Richardson can't get going, which is at least as much about the O-line as him (which is also why Luck isn't being protected enough). There are some things to sort out in Indy, and for all the problems (solvable, mostly, going forward to next year), the biggest liability is the defense (shocking, I know, for a Colts squad). There's a lot of upside for this young team, but better defense is going to have to be part of it. Arizona just shelled them, not that it was terribly surprising. I stayed off this game (somewhat ironically) because the Cards are a good team, if underrated. The Colts usually play up to their opponents, and I thought they'd be more competitive.
Carolina won again, a gritty game with a Dolphin squad that rarely wins but almost always plays it close. This was a bad spot for Carolina-- an out of division game, before a huge divisional match-up, on the road, after a string of wings--- this is a hard, hard spot for any team. Kudos to them for taking care of business and putting a little fear into the Saints.
Don't look now, but the Steelers are tied for second in the division (with the defending Superbowl champs). Cincinnati has a tough road test this week, heading out to San Diego, and the Steelers battle the Ravens. The Bengals need a win to keep up their lead.
NFL 2013 Week 12: 3-1
NFL 2013 Season Total: 22-13
Thursday, November 21, 2013
Week 12 Picks
Each year, there's usually a team or two that feel very difficult to handicap. I feel this way about the Colts, even though I'm 2-0 this season with Colts games. There are a lot of reasons to pick Arizona -2 1/2 this week-- Arizona is still fairly underrated, being overshadowed greatly by the Seahawks and 49ers in the division, Bruce Arians is a good coach who is obviously very, very familiar with the Colts, the Cards have the #2 rushing defense in the NFL, and the Colts seem to be one of those young teams that plays either up to, or down to, their opponents (this is a squad that has beat Seattle, San Francisco and Denver, but lost to St. Louis, Miami, and San Diego, and barely eeked out a road win at Tennessee last week). But is playing Arizona really playing "down"? This is a solid football team. I think Arizona is probably the correct play, but I just can't get over the nagging feeling that the Colts, with a long week, won't be underestimating their former coach's team. This game is essentially a PK, as I bet this game is lost or won on a field goal. If I could get Indianapolis +3, I'd take it. But at 2 1/2, I'll pass.
The other game I'd like to get +3 on is the Denver - NE game. Tom Brady as a home underdog, after a loss, in a place where Manning has rarely played well. At +2 1/2, it's a no play for me, not that it would surprise me for the Pats to win outright-- I just don't feel comfortable with the half point, so I'm staying off this game.
Back to the AFC South-- I'm playing on the Jags this week, +10, along with the under 43 1/2. This is strictly a trend play; double digit divisional dogs are usually solid plays. This has all the makings of a 17 - 9 kind of game, and I'll take the Jags to cover in a low-scoring affair. The Texas still have the best passing defense in the league, but are actually giving up yards on the ground. Both teams should be able to run the ball, and will elect to, since both have terrible QB situations. This should play out as a clock-devouring, churning out yards via the run type, kick field goals kind of game. Jacksonville +10, UNDER 43 1/2.
I've been burned on overs in NFC East games, but I'm going back for one more to make up a game. I'll take over the 46 in the Cowboys - Giants match-up. This is a play against the Cowboys D more than anything (giving up the most YPG than any other team). With Eli starting to throw it around better, I will take the over (which has been pushed down due to the Giants' relatively low-scoring recent outings). This number should probably be around 50 / 51, so I think there's some value in the number here. Cowboys - Giants OVER 46.
I also like Minnesota to cover on the road against Green Bay. AP is probable, and it's going to be cold. I think the Vikings D has enough to pressure Tolzien into mistakes. Minnesota has been more competitive in a lot of games than one would expect from a 2-win team. I like the Vikes +5 on the road in a cold and bitter divisional game. Minnesota +5.
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
Week 11 Recap
Andrew Luck is now 8-0 ATS after a loss, but that's the only good news to come from this week of picks. The total on the Philly - Washington game was a loser, and as soon as the red zone turnover happened, I knew it was a goner. The Redskins didn't recover from that blunder psychologically until the 4th quarter, but it was too late then. Philadelphia was up big most of the game, so just played to eat clock in the second half; had Washington been able to score instead of turn the ball over early, they would have been trying to score. One play can really screw up total plays (it's sort of like playing the under and having a special teams or defensive score-- those almost always blow the under).
The Pats were the right play, even in a losing effort. The call at the end was what it was-- really, the Pats should not have been in that situation. I'm sure there are a lot of unhappy gamblers holding NE +3 tickets this morning. Sometimes you have the right side and win, sometimes you have the right side and lose.
The other controversial call was the penalty against SF, negating a turnover that very likely could have changed the outcome of the game. I thought hard about taking the 49ers with the 3 1/2 (which would have been a winner), but NO generally plays so well at home. Still, the 49ers probably should have won this game, and were it not for that penalty, very well might have. It was a good game to watch without having a ticket in hand, though.
The most anticipated game of the weekend was by far the undefeated Chiefs at the Broncos, with the 9-0 squad 8 1/2 point underdogs. I heard a lot of chatter from a lot of smart bettors that there were fairly significant amounts of sharp money on the Broncos. I found that interesting, since more than a TD favorites are seldom sharp plays. In the end, the Broncos covered, but that game could have been closer, save a few plays. The number went under (for the second week in a row, and only the second time all year for Denver).
The Giants won again, which sets them up for a possible run at the division. I think the Eagles are the team to beat, and the Cowboys are hanging around, but the Giants could make a run. Vegas certainly seems to think so-- the Cowboys, Eagles, and Giants are all 60:1 to win the Superbowl (and the other NFC East team, the Redskins, are even worse-- 150:1). So, Vegas thinks the Giants have a better shot than the Redskins, and the same(-ish) chances of the division-leading Eagles.
NFL 2013 Week 10: 1-2
NFL 2013 Season Total: 19-12
The Pats were the right play, even in a losing effort. The call at the end was what it was-- really, the Pats should not have been in that situation. I'm sure there are a lot of unhappy gamblers holding NE +3 tickets this morning. Sometimes you have the right side and win, sometimes you have the right side and lose.
The other controversial call was the penalty against SF, negating a turnover that very likely could have changed the outcome of the game. I thought hard about taking the 49ers with the 3 1/2 (which would have been a winner), but NO generally plays so well at home. Still, the 49ers probably should have won this game, and were it not for that penalty, very well might have. It was a good game to watch without having a ticket in hand, though.
The most anticipated game of the weekend was by far the undefeated Chiefs at the Broncos, with the 9-0 squad 8 1/2 point underdogs. I heard a lot of chatter from a lot of smart bettors that there were fairly significant amounts of sharp money on the Broncos. I found that interesting, since more than a TD favorites are seldom sharp plays. In the end, the Broncos covered, but that game could have been closer, save a few plays. The number went under (for the second week in a row, and only the second time all year for Denver).
The Giants won again, which sets them up for a possible run at the division. I think the Eagles are the team to beat, and the Cowboys are hanging around, but the Giants could make a run. Vegas certainly seems to think so-- the Cowboys, Eagles, and Giants are all 60:1 to win the Superbowl (and the other NFC East team, the Redskins, are even worse-- 150:1). So, Vegas thinks the Giants have a better shot than the Redskins, and the same(-ish) chances of the division-leading Eagles.
NFL 2013 Week 10: 1-2
NFL 2013 Season Total: 19-12
Tuesday, November 12, 2013
Week 11 Picks
Three games this week, spanning Thursday night to the Monday Night game. I like the Colts -2 1/2 to take care of business and put a stranglehold on the division. Coming off an embarrassing, unfocused loss to an inferior Rams squad was a total "look ahead" moment that we often see in the NFL. The Colts were more focused on the divisional match-up with the improved Titans, in Nashville. They flat-out weren't up for the game last Sunday, and I have every reason to believe that Pagano will have his team ready to take it to the 2nd place team in the division. Had Tennessee not lost to the lowly Jags, there would be more value here, but the severity of the loss on Sunday preserved enough for me to make a play on Indy. Also, there's a strong trend here-- Andrew Luck is a perfect 7-0 ATS after a loss. Indianapolis -2 1/2.
I like the over in the Philly - Washington game. Washington hasn't been able to hold anyone but the Raiders under 20 points the entire season, and give up a lot of yardage to decent QBs (341 to Rivers, 351 to Peyton Manning, 385 to Stafford, 480 to Rodgers, etc). Foles isn't quite in this league of QBs, but I look for him to have a 300 yard day. Conversely, Washington is 5th in the league in yards per game, and I don't like Philly's defense to keep the passing game in particular in check (this a squad that gave up 280 yards to Scott Tolzien on Sunday). Philadelphia - Washington over 52 1/2.
I'm going against the conventional wisdom of the week, and going with a solid trend. Brady and Belichick after a bye. Brady and Belichick as dogs (Tom Terrific is, since 2003, 17-7 ATS as an underdog). I can still find +3 for the Pats and I'll take it. I think Carolina is solid, but slightly overrated, and the Pats after a bye are usually money. New England +3.
I like the over in the Philly - Washington game. Washington hasn't been able to hold anyone but the Raiders under 20 points the entire season, and give up a lot of yardage to decent QBs (341 to Rivers, 351 to Peyton Manning, 385 to Stafford, 480 to Rodgers, etc). Foles isn't quite in this league of QBs, but I look for him to have a 300 yard day. Conversely, Washington is 5th in the league in yards per game, and I don't like Philly's defense to keep the passing game in particular in check (this a squad that gave up 280 yards to Scott Tolzien on Sunday). Philadelphia - Washington over 52 1/2.
I'm going against the conventional wisdom of the week, and going with a solid trend. Brady and Belichick after a bye. Brady and Belichick as dogs (Tom Terrific is, since 2003, 17-7 ATS as an underdog). I can still find +3 for the Pats and I'll take it. I think Carolina is solid, but slightly overrated, and the Pats after a bye are usually money. New England +3.
Week 10 Recap
A perfect 3-0 week, coming off the Monday Night game. Tampa Bay looked solid for much of the first half, but gave up a TD on a brilliant Miami drive to close the half. The Bucs played poorly in the 3rd, with Miami taking the lead. Miami, however, could not run the ball and more importantly, couldn't stop the run, even with the bottom of Tampa RB bench. I suspected Tampa would win, so sitting with the +3 all night felt pretty good.
I really liked the St. Louis pick, and it definitely cashed. They made the Colts look like Pee-Wee football blooper reel, and dominated all three phases of the game. I think I was right about it being a trap game; Indy just wasn't ready, and wasn't competitive. I thought the Colts would be down in the game, and maybe come back to win by a field goal or late TD rally, but man, not so much. They dodged a bullet, however, with Tennessee losing to the Jags, so they are still up 2 games in the division. This actually sets up some value for Week 11, I think. This one, was, however, and easy win-- I always fear the back-door cover / late rally from Luck, but this was a hole way too deep.
I'm especially proud of the getting the right call on the Denver - San Diego under. After 8 straight overs for Denver, one finally came in under the number-- and by 10.5 points. This one was a little more of a sweat, but it worked out in the end. I actually figured it to be closer, and it very well easily could have been.
Baltimore decided to make the AFC North a little more interesting and hand the Bengals their second consecutive loss in OT. This had to be a deflating loss for Cincinnati, after the amazing rally to tie the game. Mentally, the Bengals are a little banged up-- this is a team that should be 8-4, not 6-4 with Cleveland and Baltimore still hanging around. I don't think the Bengals have much to worry about from Cleveland (which has been playing better, but somewhat overachieving I think), but Baltimore could get hot and make a run at them. Cincinnati has a must-win this coming week against the Browns, before having to face the Chargers and the Colts. If the Ravens can string together some wins here late, the December 29th Ravens - Bengals tilt in Cincy could be for a playoff berth.
The Cowboys took a beating from Brees and company all night Sunday. The Dallas defense has been shuffling players due to injury all year, and it seems to finally have caught up with them. Still, I expected this to be a closer game, but the offense couldn't pick up the slack. They started the game running the ball well, which was an auspicious start for the 'Boys, since long, sustained, clock-eating drives are needed to limit the possessions of the explosive Saints offense at home. Too quickly, though, they got in a big hole and had to abandon the game plan somewhat (and Rob Ryan's defense adjusted and closed up some of the holes in the run defense). This was just one of those games where the Cowboys just couldn't get anything to happen. This loss (with Philly's win at Green Bay [a game that most people--especially in the NFC East-- penciled in as a loss]), ties the division at a mediocre 5-5 each for the Eagles and Cowboys. Washington is still in it, and amazingly, the Giants have now won 3 in a row to be 3-6. Think about it-- on Sunday morning, Dallas was the top spot in the division, at 5-4, and the Giants were 2-6. The Cowboys are on a bye next week, and the Giants have a winnable home game against the Rodgers-less Packers. Then, the Giants get the Cowboys at home. After the dust settles on these games, it's entirely conceivable that the Giants and the Cowboys could both be sitting at 5-6. For Philly and Washington, this week's match-up is huge-- either of them could make a run at shoring up the division in the closing weeks, but they need this game.
Seattle is a tough team to handicap-- every season there are teams that I can't seem to get a handle on and almost never bet. It seems the Seahawks are always that team for me; some weeks they play close games, others, they blow out. Their beatdown of the Falcons this week didn't really tell us much, other than confirming that the Falcons are really, really bad. The NFC West is interesting, as it still seems unclear that SF is going to be able to challenge Seattle for the division. The loss to Carolina looks on the face more about a maturing Carolina team that is enjoying great defensive play and more consistent QB leadership-- but, I'm not totally convinced. I think the 49ers might be a bit overrated, and by extension, so might be Carolina. Everyone is high on the Panthers right now, but I'm not sure I'm buying it just yet.
NFL 2013 Week 10: 3-0
NFL 2013 Season Total: 18-10
Tuesday, November 5, 2013
Week 10 Picks
Three games this week, which I think are exceptionally strong plays. The first team I'm taking is the Rams to cover +10 at Indy; Indianapolis is coming off a dramatic late comeback road win against a division rival, and will be playing an inferior St. Louis team a week before they travel to second-place Tennessee. This is a classic trap game, especially with Indy's perennially suspect run defense. Zac Stacy should be able to help Kellen Clemens out by setting up short third downs. Despite the loss to the Titans (a fairly decent squad), they played them close until the 4th quarter. I like the Rams to cover and make this a closer game than expected. St. Louis +10.
I am also taking the under 58.5 in the Denver - San Diego game. Yes, Denver's defense sucks, especially in the secondary, and Manning seems to be able to throw TDs at will, but this is a huge number for a divisional game. The Broncos have pushed the number over every game this season, but have only played one division game-- against the Raiders. This is something of a must-win for both squads, with the Chiefs still 9-0; Denver doesn't want to fall another game behind, and San Diego needs this to stay alive down the stretch. I think that these teams will play it a little more conservative, especially with John Fox out. Denver should be able to pressure Rivers and disrupt the pass game, even if they can't cover the receivers. If they can get any kind of pressure on him, he's prone to mistakes. I think the under cashes this week for the first time, but barely. Denver - San Diego under 58.5.
I also like Tampa Bay +3 at home against the Dolphins. Tampa Bay is desperate for a win, and I like these mid- to late-season match ups, especially as home dogs. The line opened at the Dolphins -3.5, and is down to -2 1/2 or -3 now. The Bucs are an interesting 0-8 team, as they have actually been competitive in most of their games. In fact, they've lost by 3 or fewer points 4 times-- to the Jets, Saints, Cardinals, and Seahawks. I suspect that this game will be won or lost on a late 4th quarter field goal, so taking the +3 team is a solid play. It wouldn't surprise me in the least (especially with all the turmoil in Miami right now) if the Bucs get off the schneid this week on Monday Night Football (I also love underdogs on MNF). Tampa Bay +3.
I am also taking the under 58.5 in the Denver - San Diego game. Yes, Denver's defense sucks, especially in the secondary, and Manning seems to be able to throw TDs at will, but this is a huge number for a divisional game. The Broncos have pushed the number over every game this season, but have only played one division game-- against the Raiders. This is something of a must-win for both squads, with the Chiefs still 9-0; Denver doesn't want to fall another game behind, and San Diego needs this to stay alive down the stretch. I think that these teams will play it a little more conservative, especially with John Fox out. Denver should be able to pressure Rivers and disrupt the pass game, even if they can't cover the receivers. If they can get any kind of pressure on him, he's prone to mistakes. I think the under cashes this week for the first time, but barely. Denver - San Diego under 58.5.
I also like Tampa Bay +3 at home against the Dolphins. Tampa Bay is desperate for a win, and I like these mid- to late-season match ups, especially as home dogs. The line opened at the Dolphins -3.5, and is down to -2 1/2 or -3 now. The Bucs are an interesting 0-8 team, as they have actually been competitive in most of their games. In fact, they've lost by 3 or fewer points 4 times-- to the Jets, Saints, Cardinals, and Seahawks. I suspect that this game will be won or lost on a late 4th quarter field goal, so taking the +3 team is a solid play. It wouldn't surprise me in the least (especially with all the turmoil in Miami right now) if the Bucs get off the schneid this week on Monday Night Football (I also love underdogs on MNF). Tampa Bay +3.
Week 9 Recap
A big card that was in the end, a loser. I went 3-4 this week, though I should have been 4-3-- the Bears - Packers game went as expected, but with Aaron Rodgers getting injured, Seneca Wallace wasn't up to the task of pushing the number over. That game had 34 - 27 written all over it, as the Bears moved up and down the field all night on the Packer's D. That 9 minute, run-heavy drive in the fourth quarter was killer for the over, as the Bears were more than content to inch down the field and chew clock and settle for the field goal to go up 27 - 20. That's why they call it gambling!
The other games were hit and miss. The Pats blew the under without any help from the Steelers, and Philly hit the over without needing Oakland's contributions, as Foles went nuts. The Falcons have packed it in; this is a game I really thought they'd be competitive in, but couldn't cover the +7.5 in a divisional game. I did, however, get lucky to not push the total on the San Diego - Washington game, so 3-4 is better than 2-4-1 for the week. And the Cincinnati thing; well, yeah. That was a trap game and I totally missed it.
Speaking of trap games, there were three games that had a lot of chatter and a lot of sharp money. The KC - Buffalo game was a huge sharp play this week, and the sharps had the right side and lost. The Bills had gobs of offense, but couldn't handle the ball. The Bills should have won this game out-right (and many smart bettors were all over this pick), but the inability to hold on the ball in key situations sent the Chiefs to 9-0. I was off this game because of the QB situation, and I'm glad I did. Still, Buffalo should have won this one. Vegas killed the public on the Saints, another game I stayed off of-- I would have played the Jets around +9, but Vegas outwitted the public and had the Saints as a short favorite and built up a huge win with the Jets winning outright. The Indy - Houston game was another one-- Indy had a lot of action as a short road favorite, especially since Houston has imploded. The sharp play was the Texans, but I just can't go against Luck and his penchant for the late rally and cover. And rally they did-- the script was perfect for Houston after the first half, but the Colts came back, in no small measure due to T. Y. Hilton getting over his butterfingers and looking like an elite receiver for the first time all season.
How about those Cleveland Browns? It's nice to see the Bengals and the Browns in the two top spots in that division, after so many years of dominance between the Steelers and Ravens. The Browns and the Titans are quietly decent teams, along with Arizona. There should be some value there in the weeks to come, in the right spots.
NFL 2013 Week 9: 3-4
NFL 2013 Season Total: 15-10
NFL 2013 Season Total: 15-10
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)